Understanding Minnesota negligence law is essential for anyone considering a personal injury claim. In this state, negligence is determined by a system that balances responsibility between the parties involved. Minnesota applies a modified comparative negligence rule, which allows an injured party to recover compensation as long as their share of fault does not exceed 50 percent. To succeed in a claim, the injured person must show that the other party had a legal duty of care, breached that duty, and caused harm as a direct result. The amount of compensation available is then adjusted based on the injured party’s percentage of fault.
This framework ensures accountability while allowing those harmed to recover damages. At the end of the day, each case depends on the details, and that is where the support of the Schmidt & Salita Law Team becomes crucial.
Negligence can appear in different forms depending on the situation. Courts in Minnesota generally recognize several categories:
Statistics highlight the impact of negligence in Minnesota. Distracted driving contributes to more than 25 percent of all crashes statewide each year. Nationally, falls account for thousands of injuries and deaths annually, many of which stem from negligence in property maintenance. These figures show just how widespread and severe negligence cases can be.
In addition, research from the Minnesota Department of Health notes that unintentional injuries remain one of the top five causes of death statewide. Workplace safety reports also show that more than 70,000 nonfatal occupational injuries occur annually in Minnesota. These data points emphasize how negligence extends beyond traffic accidents and personal injuries, reaching into professional environments, construction sites, and healthcare settings.
Proving negligence in a personal injury case establishes liability for the injuries caused by the accident. In Minnesota, proving negligence involves showing clearly the following four key components:
To prove these elements, the plaintiff may need to collect evidence, including medical records, police reports, witness statements, and expert testimony. Maintaining meticulous records and statements that substantiate your claim is crucial, regardless of whether you choose to hire a lawyer. These documents can serve as invaluable evidence, strengthening your case and increasing your chances of a favorable outcome.
Negligence can arise in various circumstances, from everyday situations to more complex professional duties. Some of the most common examples in Minnesota include:
Minnesota reports tens of thousands of emergency visits from falls every year, and motor vehicle crashes remain a leading cause of injury-related deaths. These statistics underscore how negligence cases touch nearly every aspect of life in Minnetonka and across the state.
Other examples include negligent security cases where property owners fail to adequately protect tenants or visitors, leading to assaults or theft. In the professional realm, accountants or financial advisors can face negligence claims if their actions cause clients significant economic losses. These examples demonstrate how negligence is not confined to one industry or setting but is a widespread legal issue that can affect anyone.
In Minnetonka, winter weather often contributes to unique negligence scenarios, such as slip and fall accidents on unshoveled sidewalks or icy parking lots. The city’s proximity to Lake Minnetonka also means that boating accidents can raise negligence questions, particularly when operators fail to follow safety regulations. These local factors show how negligence cases can vary depending on community conditions and lifestyle, adding another layer of complexity to personal injury claims.
In Minnesota, for any person who has been injured to collect in any personal injury case, it is necessary to prove that the party that caused the injury was at fault. Under Minnesota law, fault can be proven by proof of negligence or strict liability.
Negligence is defined as “doing what a reasonable person would not do” or “failing to do what a reasonable person would do”. The first is called commission (committing an act that shouldn’t be done, such as speeding in a car). The second is called omission (omitting to do what a person should do, such as failing to stop at a stop sign).
Strict liability is defined as fault which is imposed on a person regardless of negligence. An example is the Minnesota Dog Bite law where the owner of the dog is at fault for any attack by the dog, even if the owner had no reason to believe that the dog was dangerous and no other reason to think that the dog might do some damage.
In many cases, there is a claim that the party that is seeking was also at fault. Under Minnesota law, the injured person can still collect if that person is equal to or less at fault than the party against whom the claim is being made.
The fault of the party seeking damages (the Plaintiff) is called “contributory negligence”.
When the jury determines that the Defendant was negligent and also determines that the Plaintiff was also negligent, the jury is then asked to determine the “comparative fault” of both parties. This decision is called the “comparative fault” decision because the jury is comparing the fault of the respective parties. The jury is asked to determine the percentage of fault between the two (or more) parties.
Under Minnesota law, if the Plaintiff’s fault is greater than that of the Defendant, the Plaintiff is not allowed to collect damages. If the Defendants’ fault is greater or equal to that of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff is allowed to collect, but the amount that the Plaintiff can (For example, if the Defendant is found to be 70% at fault and the Plaintiff 30% at fault and the damages are determined by the jury to be $50,000.00, the Plaintiff will then collect $35,000.00.)
In some cases, there will be more than one Defendant. In that event, the fault of all three parties is compared, and the Plaintiff can only recover against any Defendant whose comparative fault is equally or greater. (Note: the result can be complicated in the case of multiple parties. The advice of an experienced personal injury lawyer should be consulted to explain the outcome of those cases.
Comparative fault and comparative negligence are closely related concepts in personal injury law but are not entirely the same. Both terms are used to describe how liability is distributed when multiple parties are at fault in an accident. Their application can affect how a case is argued and how damages are awarded.
Comparative fault is a broader term for the legal doctrine that affects the amount of compensation based on the degree of fault. In Minnesota, this principle is applied under the state’s “modified comparative fault” rule (Minnesota Statute Section 604.01).
Under this rule, if a plaintiff is partially at fault, their recovery is reduced by their percentage of fault. For example, if a plaintiff is 5% at fault for an accident, their damages will be reduced by 5%. Importantly, if the plaintiff shares 50% or more of the fault, they are barred from recovering any damages.
On the other side, comparative negligence is specifically used to describe the plaintiff’s contribution to the accident through their negligence. This denotes failure to observe reasonable care, resulting in harm to another party.
As noted, comparative fault encompasses comparative negligence. It can also include other forms of fault, such as intentional misconduct or strict liability.
For individuals seeking compensation under Minnesota law, several steps are generally involved:
It is essential to understand how Minnesota defines fault. Under Minnesota Statutes Section 604.01 – Comparative Fault, fault includes acts or omissions that are negligent or reckless toward another person’s property or safety, or conduct that creates strict tort liability. Additionally, liability for damages involving multiple parties can be allocated under Minnesota Statutes Section 604.02 – Joint Liability. These statutes highlight how broad negligence can be and why documenting each step of the case is vital.
Beyond filing, claimants should be aware of how damages may be calculated. Courts often review medical bills, lost wages, and non-economic harm like pain and suffering. Evidence from experts such as accident reconstructionists or medical professionals can further strengthen the case. These additional layers of preparation ensure that claims are supported by factual evidence and professional testimony.
Negligence laws in Minnesota are complex and often overwhelming. The Schmidt & Salita Law Team helps people in Minnetonka and beyond pursue justice and fair compensation. We review the facts, explain legal options in plain language, and guide clients through every step, from the first consultation to resolution.
Our attorneys know local families’ challenges and work to ease stress while pursuing the best possible outcome. We combine legal knowledge with compassion, ensuring clients feel supported throughout the process. Call us at (952) 473-4530 to discuss your case and learn how we can support you.
Dean Salita is a seasoned Personal Injury lawyer with over 30 years of experience, specializing in workplace injuries and occupational diseases like asbestos-related illnesses. He’s the chair of the Minnesota Association for Justice Workers’ Compensation section and has been recognized as a Super Lawyer with an AV rating by Martindale-Hubbell. Dean is dedicated to providing personal, compassionate legal support to his clients, guiding them through trials and the legal process.
This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by Founding Partner, Dean M. Salita, with more than 30 years of legal experience as a personal injury attorney.
When someone is injured because of another person’s carelessness, one of the first questions they ask is how are damages calculat...
view article
Seeking burn compensation in Minnesota can feel overwhelming, especially when the costs of treatment and lost wages start to build....
view article
In Minnesota, workers' comp permanent disability settlement discussions often focus on two key categories: Permanent Partial Disabi...
view article
Oveer 135 reviews
1600 Hopkins Crossroad
Minnetonka, MN 55305
Phone (952) 473-4530
Toll Free 1-800-656-8450
Fax (952) 544-1308
call us: 952.473.4530
