My case is going to a jury trial

My case is going to jury trial – What should I expect?

Regrettably, we have been unable to settle your case. The final resort is to go to trial and let the jury decide what is the fair value of your case.

Contact Our Minnesota Injury Lawyers

free case consultation call us: 952.473.4530

What Is The Procedure, I.E. Schedule Of Events?

Typically, the schedule of events in a jury trial before the Judge is as follows:

• Attorney conference with Judge. Typically, the Judge will want to confirm with both attorneys before starting a trial to result in last-minute motions and/or to alert the judge as to any special or unique legal issues that can be expected to arise during the trial of the case. Typically, the Judge does not want the parties present during this part of the trial.
• Jury selection. Trials in Minnesota are before a jury of six to eight people. In the event that any of the jurors are unable to complete a trial and should be excused from jury service by the Judge, it can proceed to a final decision by a jury of at least six.

The jury selection process includes questioning by the judge and then the attorneys for all of the parties.  This is called “Voir Dire.” During the jury selection process, jurors may be excused on the basis of a “challenge for cause,” which means that the juror has indicated that there is some legal basis that would disqualify the jury.

*The results are conditioned to the unique circumstances of each case. These results do not guarantee your case will result in the same compensation.

Settlement

$2.2M

Truck Driver

Settlement

$53M

Insurance Fraud

Settlement

$1.5M

Sexual Assault

Settlement

$220K

Insurance Fraud

Settlement

$600K

Product Liability

Settlement

$2.4M

Wrongful Death

free case consultation call us: 952.473.4530

After the jury questioning, each party is allowed to strike to jurors without having to give any reason for doing so. The remaining jurors then will be formally “seated” on the jury panel that will listen to the evidence and decide the case.

• Opening Statements. After the jury is selected, each of the attorneys is allowed to give an opening statement.  The Plaintiff’s attorney goes first, followed by the defense attorneys.  The attorneys are allowed, in their opening statements, to outline briefly the legal issues and the expected evidence.  They are not supposed to “argue” the case.
• Presentation of the Evidence. After the opening statements, the parties are allowed to present their evidence.  The plaintiff proceeds first with the testimony of witnesses and the offering of exhibits such as medical records, medical bills, and other types of documentary evidence. After the plaintiff submits his/her presenting evidence and “rests,” the defendant is allowed to proceed with the presentation of evidence. After the defense “rests,” the plaintiff is then allowed to present rebuttal evidence.  The rules of evidence are very strict as to what rebuttal evidence can be offered and as a consequence, rebuttal evidence is rarely offered and/or allowed by the judge.
• Closing arguments. After the presentation of the evidence, each attorney is allowed to make a “closing statement,” in which the attorney is allowed to fully argue the case.  In this portion of the trial, the defense attorney goes first.  The plaintiff’s attorney argues last.
• Jury instructions. At the conclusion of the case, the judge will instruct the jury as to the law that they are to apply to the evidence that they have heard, then arrive at a “special verdict.” (Some judges prefer to give the jury instructions before the closing arguments. The majority of judges give the jury instructions after the lawyers have completed the closing arguments.)  The special verdict contains a list of questions that the jurors are required to answer. The jury’s answers to these questions on the special verdict are then used by the judge to arrive at the final judgment, or decision in the case.
• Jury Deliberation. The jury is then sent to the jury room for “deliberation,” a term that simply refers to the process of making the decision and arriving at the answers that they place on the special verdict. During the first 6 hours, the verdict must be unanimous. After six hours of deliberation, the verdict can be reached by all but one dissenting juror. The special verdict form is then presented to the judge. The parties and the other attorneys are not required to remain during the jury deliberation process and typically do not. The judge or his courtroom personnel will then call the attorneys for the respective parties and advise them of the jury’s decision

Client Reviews

What Our Clients Are Saying About Us

NB

Google Review

Schmidt Law Firm is so much more than the usual out for their back pocket firm they are a group of truly caring people. I was hit by a car & have memory loss. I don’t know how many times they all had to go over and over the same thing with me. They even gave me reminder calls for my doctors appointments. When things were so overwhelming I would call and all I could do is cry and they listened and never once complained or cut me short. Doug and Vanessa were all very helpful so was the rest of the staff. God Bless them all. By the way they got me a lot more than I had hoped for. You really don’t want to be on the opposing side of the table of Doug, he will rip you before you know he did it and he does it in such a nice way.

Amy Cassidy

a month ago

Josh was awesome! He’s a very down to earth guy and very helpful when I was struggling with the pain from my injury and all the stress that comes with dealing with work comp. Also, his legal assistant Lori is amazing! She was so genuine and always listened to what I had to say. I highly recommend this law firm!

Mary Davis

6 months ago

I have nothing but a great experience with this law firm. Dealing with an accident on top of injuries can be extremely stressful. When choosing representation you want a team with exceptional experience and knowledge. I have personally worked with Joshua Laabs for many years. He’s very polite and professional, and cares about the person beyond just the case. He cares not only about your injuries but that you are properly represented and treated medically. He cares beyond numbers about his clients. He works diligently and hard for the best outcome for his clients. This is the type of person and firm you want representing you in your personal injury case.

Tim Ginn

a year ago

Doug Schmidt is an ultimate professional and legal counselor who not only helped me in the intense and overwhelming legal matters of my personal injury case , but took a sincere personal interest in me and what I was going through medically to get the best possible outcomes for my healing. One of the many things he is quite knowledgeable about are concussions, even giving lectures to other chiropractors and health care professionals on this important misunderstood topic. Shortly after our first discussion, he wanted me to get further testing in regards to a possible concussion as part of the aftermath of my car accident. I know I would have overlooked this very important outcome had it not been for Doug and his kind and caring concern. I am still dealing with post concussion symptoms, but Doug is the one who steered me in the right direction for further help and healing. He goes above and beyond what most “typical” attorneys would do. Doug is anything but “typical”. I am so impressed with his integrity, knowledge, skillfulness, and kindness as a person and an attorney, that I couldn’t be happier than to highly recommend him for any personal injury case! He is amazing! I feel very fortunate to have him on “my side”. Thank you, Doug! Karen Ginn

Sarah Nordby

2 years ago

I was involved in a car accident that left me in debilitating pain. I can’t even begin to explain everything I’ve been through the past five years, or how it has changed my life. I will tell you that I wouldn’t have gotten through it without Dean and Caitlin. Dean walked me through the entire process from start to finish. I didn’t have to do anything except focus on getting better. Caitlin was always a quick email or phone call away. She worked tirelessly to go after the insurance company when they wouldn’t pay my medical bills. It was like having my own assistant. I literally didn’t have to talk to any of these people. She did everything for me. In the end, all my medical bills were paid and I ended up with a nice settlement that I feel was well deserved after everything I’ve been through. If you are looking for good representation. I highly recommend Schmidt & Salita Law Team. An experienced group that will fight to get you what you deserve.

View More Reviews on Google Maps and Yelp